Monday, May 27, 2019

Eragon The Movie vs. Eragon The Novel Essay

People have distinguishable views in life. Some would opt to wallow with the spectator of words and the power of the imagination, while others would opt for movies and witness the adores of visual effects. Some of the stories made turn out to be inspirations for many, while others be decrease a ride force for good deal to go on and continue with life. One of the most interesting stories in Literature is Eragon. Due to the history and the lessons that both children and adults would learn, the novel was qualified as a movie into the thumping screen. However, I believe that the novel interlingual rendition of Eragon is still better than the movie version.THE STORY The story revolves around a young boy, named Eragon, who grew up in a small farm in Carvahall together with his uncle and cousin. During one and only(a) of his hunting trips in the mountains, he found a big blue stone. The stone attracted him greatly, and Eragon thought that if sold in the city, the stone would be en ough to suffice for their winter needs. Unknown to Eragon, the blue stone was actually a dragon egg, ready to hatch. Since care for dragons was prohibited by the king, Eragon had no choice but to secretly raise the poor animal, naming her Saphira.Eventually, they were haunted down by the kings men and had no choice but to flee the village. Eragons uncle, Garrow, died due to his injuries, making him furious and hungry for revenge. Eragons journey towards extract with Saphira led to more secrets. In the course of their adventures, Brom proposed that he would do whatever it takes to help Eragon. The symbol in Eragons hand shows that he is indeed one of the dragon riders, like how Brom used to be. Towards the course of the journey, he was transformed from an ordinary teenager to a sword-fighting rider knowledgeable in magic and the ways of genus Draco Riders.Eragon meets more people and encounters more life-threatening situations towards the course of the journey, which allows him to learn more around himself. His quest for revenge allowed him to learn more about himself, and how his search for answers would excrete him to protect a whole Empire. SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES Books always have their own identity as compared to the contract adaptations. This may be attributed to the fact that readers are given the prospect to view the novel in their own way, and see things according to what their imagination has to offer.The book and film version of Eragon had the same dilemma. Both media had the opportunity to share with people the wonders that Eragons life had to offer, and at the same time bring them to a world unknown to many. However, the 2 media used as well had their own differences. The film version was intricately made in such a way that the viewing audience would become curious of what the story has to offer. The special effects used in the film version would definitely come as an impressive work of art. The descriptions set in the book, such as Sa phiras appearance were perfectly executed in the film.One who has read the book with agree with me, especially in the details set for the other locations in the film. The language used in both versions were also similar with each other. The book on the other hand, made us of too many words. Some of the dialogues and scenes were cut in the film version, somehow bighearted the viewers a different impression of how the story would go. Take for example Eragons journey. Some of the places were deleted, and even Eragons reactions towards Katrina were deleted in the film version. In this manner, the maculation of the story was somewhat changed deviating from the original context of the novel.PERSONAL ANALYSIS The film version of Eragon was something to be considered. Those who have read the novel would have different impressions about the adaptation, especially when some of the important scenes and dialogues have been deleted. Although the aim of the producers was to fit the whole book i n one film, this should have been done using a different approach. In the same manner, I also admire how the visual effects were executed. Saphira was one of the wonders of the whole story, and this was very well presented in the film adaptation.Arya herself was a wonder to marvel at. As the book would have it, she was a beautiful elf, and was supposed to look mysterious at some point in the story. This was done perfectly, and I believe the actress who played her should also be given credit. Unfortunately, the film and the book had so many differences. The film version would look as if it was another story formed from the original novel, and not an adaptation. Although both had considered to keep the plot as the center of the film, the choice of words made the story difficult to absorb.Both readers and viewers would have difficulty in trying to keep in tune with the story because of the many names and places it included. For someone who has seen both media, disappointment would not come as a surprise. However, for those who have not read the book, the film adaptation is impressive, especially with how Saphira was manipulated.Works CitedEragon. Dir. Stefan Fanmeier. Perf. Jeremy Irons, John Malkovich, Sienna Guillory, Edward Speleers, and Rachel Weisz. 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment, 20 March 2007. Paolini, Christopher. Eragon. Alfred A.Knopf Books for Young Readers, 2003. Eragon. 2006. Eragon the Movie. 22 January 2009 . Eragon. The Internet Movie Database. 22 January 2009 . Eragon. Book Browse. 22 Janury 2009 . Eragon (Inheritance, Book I). 2003. Kids Turn Central. 22 January 2009 . Eragon DVD Review. 22 January 2009 .

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.